The STF’s decision
The STF’s decision to create a crime of homotransphobia is not only unworkable, but also does not respect the powers provided for by law. Is it the responsibility of UNI-O (Art. 22, I of the 1988 Federal Constitution) to create rates?but this is just one of the drawbacks that yesterday’s decision can involve in the brazilians’ routine.
- Minister Celso de Mello’s statement on safeguarding religious freedom is insufficient.
- The action leaves the Church vulnerable to the discontent of LGBT activist groups that.
- Even with the current legal system (which they say is not effective).
- Are already trying to find ways to suppress religious freedom.
- Expression and even academic freedom.
- Who will say exactly when a demonstration constitutes a hate speech or not?Who will determine what a hate speech is?If that is the answer.
- I believe that there will be no chains.
- Because the authentic Christian will continue to affirm that homosexual practice is a sin and harmful to the Creator.
However, not least, this trial directly attacks freedom of opinion, especially when no one can specify what a hate speech/opinion is or not. It never goes without remembering: the criminalization of opinion is typical of exceptional regimes.
It is important, always to emphasize, that all are respected, regardless of their sexual choice, we are all worthy and must keep our freedoms preserved, because without freedom or with limited freedom, defeat will always be the dignity of the human person. .
The Supreme Court’s conclusion circumvents the sovereignty of the spheres and jeopardizes the fundamental rights and guarantees of millions of Brazilians: Protestants, Roman Catholics, scholars, questioners and even those who resonate with simple disagreements with homosexual and transgender practices.
For more information, see the video below: