Before addressing the issues of the violation of religious freedom and the open aversion to religious sentiment that is taking place in Chile, it is important to reflect on how progressives glimpse a coup d’ere. The Chilean situation is accompanied by a quaint analysis by experts. It works like this: in Brazil, the accusation of a former president who has proven to have acted against morality in the field of public administration and the election of a conservative constitute a coup d’eer.
But is the wave of protests marked by vandalism and violence in Chile a revolution, according to Marxist thought, is the basic socialist conception framed in a model of rebellion that undermines the democratic rule of law?But it does not imply that this is the case, a civil disobedience based on dirty bases, that is, the attack on fundamental freedoms in favor of the supremacy of an ideology.
- Historically.
- The socialist model has a clear aversion to methodological individualism from a liberal point of view.
- But it is not for a social cause.
- For this model the important thing is to maintain dependence and thus perpetuate power.
- Are leaders generally extremely conservative with their families and liberals with their money?Just remember the character who refers to Nicols Maduro in Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan series: President Nicolas Reyes offers a luxurious life to his family.
- Threatening his opponent in the [Gloria Bonalde] elections.
- While Venezuela sinks socially and economically.
- In short.
- There should be no room for other ideas.
- And society must remain in state teams: even if it remains in a vegetative diagnosis.
- In addition to handling the wrong medicines.
- When in reality it is possible to recover the cause of the disease.
And people who take to the streets to promote chaos: people incapable of facing some suffering [of the temporary majority] and disgusted with personal responsibility: the Chilean situation is a mixture of Marxism and moral emoivism 😕 I am not in a position to take care of myself, and I want to cede control of my life to the state. Since I have no faith, I do not appreciate religious sentiment and I am not interested in creating jobs and income, is it worth dropping bombs and act in a civilized manner? Disobedience to try to consolidate a socialist regime? And so they continue to build bridges for secular elites to return to power. They forget the reality perceived by Dr. Antony Mueller:
“Similarly, in socialist regimes, economic stagnation and authoritarianism go hand in hand,” says Antony Mueller, PhD in economics at Erlangen-Nurberg University and professor at the Federal University of Sergipe. In socialism, he says, the lack of a price system requires governments to impose sanctions to try to remedy the mistakes of bad economic decisions. The reality of socialism — and we have cases on all major continents, Europe, America, Asia, and Africa — shows that it is accompanied by political dictatorships and all kinds of brutal social control. Does socialism make countries not only poor, but also free? he says.
When a group commits to ending freedom in favor of total and blind submission to the state, not only will social and economic problems be under the control of the tyrannical hand: other fundamental freedoms, including religious freedom, are lost. It is worth remembering the situation that took way on November 12, 2019 in which a church was burned down in Santiago, the capital of Chile: the parish of Veracruz?Attacked by vandalos who are engaged in the destruction of Christian symbols and therefore frustrate the freedom to profess faith, it is a sign of the reasons that permeate the socialist revolution. It is an objectively harmful fact to the dignity of the human person: attack on religious sentiment and people seeking justification to make the sinister something necessary for revolution to achieve its ends!Among these individuals, we highlight Brazilian specialists who are not willing to spend holidays in Chile and those manipulated who do not learn from the experience [2]. The great truth is that when the right to believe is subjugated, the notion of all other fundamental freedoms is lost.
[1] How socialist countries destroyed the future of 5 countries. Read more: https://www. gazetadopovo. com. br/ideias/como-politicas-socialistas-destruiram-o-futuro-de-5-paises/ Copyright © 2019, Gazeta do Povo. All rights reserved.
[2] Ignorance of empirical facts is the result of Marxist theory: “The tradition of all past generations is like a nightmare that compresses the brains of the living. And just when they seem committed to transforming themselves and things, to creating something. “never before seen, exactly in these times of revolutionary crisis, they fearfully evoke the help of the spirits of the past, borrow their names, their slogans. , their?gurino, to represent, with this venerable traditional costume and borrowed language, the new scenes of world history. Thus Luther disguised himself as an Apostle Paul, the revolution of 1789-1814 disguised itself as a Roman Republic or Roman Caesarism, and the revolution of 1848 found nothing better than to make the parody, on the one hand, of the year 1789 and, on the other, the revolutionary tradition of 1793-95. MARX, Karl. The 18 Brumario de Luus Bonaparte. Sao Paulo: BoiTempoal, 2011. p. 25-26.